I figured since Donner likes classical music, some of the CDs he’s ripping are probably larger than a normal contemporary music CD. The first one I pulled out was “Pink Floyd- Animals” but it was only 5 tracks at 275.2 MB. For this experiment I wanted to use a Red Book CD which means it’s just a normal CD. Since all CDs are different, I wanted to find one that was larger than most to err on the safe side. Hard Drive: WD Caviar Black 3TB 7200 RPM SATA 6Gb/s 64MB Cache 3.5 Inch
System Type: 64-bit Operating System, 圆4-based processorĭVD ROM: HP SATA DVD RAM GH82N (48x max CD read rate) Processor: AMD A10-5700 APU 3.4 GHz w/Radeon HD Graphics I added 8 GB of RAM to it to bring it to 16 GB and added the 3TB hard drive. Here’s my modest desktop PC that I purchased from Office Depot in 2013 for $500. I'm going to rip a CD in dBpoweramp and time it and then do the same in EAC and will report back with the results.Īlright here are the results from my test today.
You just could have said it a little nicer. His current rip times are way too long and something is holding him back. That's all I wanted him to take into account if his rip times are any faster or maybe even slower with the USB drive because he wouldn't really be comparing apples to apples.
I have a portable one here that is a lot slower than my SATA. Notice I said "tend" to be faster? I agree with you but from what Donner was describing it kind of sounded like he might be using an older USB DVDROM. The latest version of USB (3.1) is the faster between USB and SATA. The transfer rates of the interfaces depend on the standard that they adhere to. Perhaps, he should give answers that are founded in fact, rather than just post superficial fluff.Īll three of the scenarios that you listed for reasons that the rips are slow (which is subjective) are obvious to you and anyone else with the competency to rip a cd to a mass storage device. I informed him that he was giving an inaccurate answer. My DVD/CD external computer drives connect thru my computer's USB 2.0 port and do not work with USB 3.0. I can also stand pat with EAC and get to my destination slower than I would like. When I installed the software it gave me the option of two ripping speeds, a slower more accurate speed and a faster speed. Three likely problems and solutions for CD ripping speed are 1) my DVD/CD drive is deficient - try a different DVD/CD drive 2) the setup in the software needs to be changed to enable faster ripping - try a different setting in the software and 3) the software itself is limited and does not allow for faster ripping - try a different ripping program. He was merely offering "What if you tried this or that" advice to me. The drives themselves are the same, the interfaces are different. SATA drives are not faster than USB drives. You sure like to post.do your research first. SATA drives tend to be faster than USB ones though.
These infections might corrupt your computer installation or breach your privacy.Ĭue file keygen or key generator might contain a trojan horse opening a backdoor on your computer.I'd give it a try.
While you are searching and browsing these illegal sites which distribute a so called keygen, key generator, pirate key, serial number, warez full version or crack forĬue file. Your computer will be at risk getting infected with spyware, adware, viruses, worms, trojan horses, dialers, etc Including Rapidshare, MegaUpload, YouSendIt, Letitbit, DropSend, MediaMax, HellShare, HotFile, FileServe, LeapFile, MyOtherDrive or MediaFire, Download links are directly from our mirrors or publisher's website,Ĭue file torrent files or shared files from free file sharing and free upload services,
Using warez version, crack, warez passwords, patches, serial numbers, registration codes, key generator, pirate key, keymaker or keygen forĬue file license key is illegal. Top 4 Download periodically updates software information of cue file full versions from the publishers,īut some information may be slightly out-of-date.